Posted: Oct 02, 2017 6:44 pm
Ball’s in your court. Either you want to explain your position or you do not. That you keep erecting ever more lengthy points to avoid providing a explanation at this point makes your willingness to do so functionally no different from your ability to do so.
For brevity.
I've revisited the posts on the vagueness of "free at the point of need" and at no point have you been tasked with defending a position you do not hold. I stated my understanding of the principle which underpins it, I did not task you with defending that, as you clearly articulated your view between "the principle" and how you felt "free at the point of need" was vague. I then asked you to provide an explanation of why it (free at the point of need) was vague. I'm only asking you to explain your original position, nothing more, nothing less.
On the matter of you quote mining me. I stand by my position. I acknowledge that you disagree and your apparent strength of feeling on the matter. However, I'm not going to change my position simply because you disagree.
You can continue to chose to avoid explaining your position and come up with endless excuses as to why you won't or you can crack on. Your call. I've no interest in dancing to your requirements just because you think I should. Either you discuss the issue of substance or you leave.
The only person who can explain your position is you. If you choose not to by constructing whatever reasons and excuses to avoid doing so, then that is entirely you. Balls entirely in your court.
For brevity.
I've revisited the posts on the vagueness of "free at the point of need" and at no point have you been tasked with defending a position you do not hold. I stated my understanding of the principle which underpins it, I did not task you with defending that, as you clearly articulated your view between "the principle" and how you felt "free at the point of need" was vague. I then asked you to provide an explanation of why it (free at the point of need) was vague. I'm only asking you to explain your original position, nothing more, nothing less.
On the matter of you quote mining me. I stand by my position. I acknowledge that you disagree and your apparent strength of feeling on the matter. However, I'm not going to change my position simply because you disagree.
You can continue to chose to avoid explaining your position and come up with endless excuses as to why you won't or you can crack on. Your call. I've no interest in dancing to your requirements just because you think I should. Either you discuss the issue of substance or you leave.
The only person who can explain your position is you. If you choose not to by constructing whatever reasons and excuses to avoid doing so, then that is entirely you. Balls entirely in your court.