Posted: Apr 21, 2019 12:01 pm
by Animavore
Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:
Animavore wrote:
Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:
Animavore wrote:

Science is impartial by nature.


Of course, otherwise it wouldn't be science. But the source itself, is that impartial?


It's a scientific resource with contributions from actual scientists. So yes.


I see. What makes these contributors "actual scientists" as opposed to "pretend scientists"? I'm sure there are plenty of scientists who do not agree with your "actual scientists". Hence why I'm asking you if this is an impartial source.


They are scientists in the relevant field who have contributed peer-reviewed articles.

As for scientists who "disagree", all you can do is read them both and decide for yourself who is more internally consistent and which side pull the facts and evidence from disparate fields together in a way which is more consilient and which contradict the facts and themselves.