Posted: Apr 27, 2019 10:24 am
by Spearthrower
Pridefel Knowitelz wrote:Still no evidence.



Not sure if you're just used to conversing with simpletons or something, PK but....

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news- ... l#p2691886

A thoroughly comprehensive review of the physical basis for the UN's position on climate change
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/

The Royal Society of Science:
https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy ... unique.PDF

The scientific evidence is now overwhelming that the climate is warming and that human activity is largely responsible for this change through emissions of greenhouse gases.

...

Any international policy response to climate change must be rooted in the latest scientific evidence. This indicates that if we are to have a reasonable chance of limiting global warming in this century to 2°C relative to the pre-industrial period, we must transition to a zero-carbon world by early in the second half of the century.

To achieve this transition, governments should demonstrate leadership by recognising the risks climate change poses, embracing appropriate policy and technological responses, and seizing the opportunities of low-carbon and climate-resilient growth.



22 Commonwealth Countries Consensus Statement on Climate Change

https://royalsociety.org/-/media/news/2 ... h-2018.pdf

The consensus view of the global climate science communitybased on currentevidence is that avoiding the worst impacts of climate change will require concerted global action to reduce atmospheric carbon.A target to limit warmingto below 2°C above pre-industrial levels was recognised by 160 nations that ratified the 2015 Paris Agreement on Climate Change; a bold and vital step towards addressing climate change.Meeting this target will requireachieving net-zero global greenhouse gas emissions in the second half of the Centuryfollowed by active decarbonisation of the atmosphere



You can put your fingers in your ears and shout LA LA LA... but that only means you're unwilling to review the evidence, not that ample evidence hasn't been given to you on a plate. Everyone here is adequately competent when it comes to seeing through people who want their uninformed opinions to trump reality.