rationalskepticism.org

Scot Dutchy wrote:

Spearthrower wrote:

Scot Dutchy wrote:Exactly. Why would he kill himself?

What about the several reasons I've already given you?

Nothing else is possible according to you?

Funny eh?

http://www.rationalskepticism.org/news- ... l#p2709332

Spearthrower wrote:

Scot Dutchy wrote:Is there anyone that actually believes this was suicide?

I believe its the default explanation until evidence warrants other causes.

Many things are 'possible' - but there's a wide gulf between 'possible' and 'actually happened', and that gulf is filled with evidence, not emotive speculation.

Whereas, you've already said:

Scot Dutchy wrote:The trouble is we will never know one way or the other.

But while contending we will never know, you also apparently want to insist that he didn't in fact kill himself but rather was murdered, and that anyone who doesn't leap to join you in that belief based on nothing is...

Scot Dutchy wrote:Taking the kool-aid.

Typical conspiracy claptrap.

Scot Dutchy wrote:What about the simple fact he would not.

What about the standard usage of the word 'fact'?