Posted: Aug 12, 2019 2:09 pm
What exactly are you supposed to be laughing at, Scot?
Given what I've written, all it would take to convince me that he was murdered is evidence.
Whereas given what you've written, you apparently would never believe, regardless of anything shown to you, that Epstein committed suicide - you've already constructed a convenient little narrative about how we'll never know, and the same shadowy forces which performed the alleged deed here presumably could just as easily manipulate a coroner, or an autopsy report.
Which one is the rational position to hold? Which one is clearly antithetical to reason?
I know, I know, it's the Politics subforum, so bravado, condescension, and overt displays of over-confidence are the preferred means of staking discursive legitimacy, but we all know that your comments here directly emulate every other conspiracy theorist in history. You know it too. Back down Scot, it's not hard and you won't lose face for not digging deeper into a stupid position.
Remember: rational skepticism, the entire fucking point of this forum is to challenge wishful thinking.