Posted: Mar 03, 2020 7:11 am
by gobshite
Cito di Pense wrote:
gobshite wrote:
Cito di Pense wrote:
I asked you what condition excuses you from even establishing your position, let alone justifying it. I think what we'll find is that you assume your position has already been established by others, and that you're just standing on the sidelines waving your pompoms and your megaphone.


I reasoned out my opinion here

Looks like you need to work on your reading skills.


This?

gobshite wrote:When you look at the broader picture of a protest action, you can see how an act of disruption can actually lead to greater awareness and support for the protest cause.

* Interestingly, as safe as milk would know if he'd ever been to a protest, not everyone who is disrupted is pissed off about the disruption. It's very common to find supporters amongst the disrupted.


That consists of further ex recto assertions on your part,


I've stated that this is an opinion, and it's an opinion that I've at least tried to reason out. You'll note (or perhaps not, as apparently you need to work on your reading skills) that SAM ridiculously claimed that his baseless opinion was "fact"! :lol: In other posts that you've failed to read (do you need work on your reading skills?) I made the point that support for action on climate change is growing just as climate protest action is growing. Now correlation doesn't necessarily men causation, but it's at least a point of reasoning. Which is a hell of lot more than SAM, and you, have managed.

Anyway, I'm not really interested in salving your butthurt. SAM and I were done on the conversation, which suited me just fine. i'm not interested in restarting the conversation with him via proxy.