Posted: Aug 19, 2020 8:34 pm
felltoearth wrote:Mike_L wrote:Binney might yet reexamine his original thesis now that the "hack" claim is looking so threadbare.
It is?
He has already (July 27th this year)...
CIA Fabricated Russiagate ‘Evidence’, Says Former NSA Tech Chief
Thursday, 30 July 2020
Article: Eric Zuesse
An important public statement was made on July 27th by Bill Binney, the U.S. Government’s top expert on the internet, and on computer hacking. He had been the Technical Director of the NSA when he quit and became a whistleblower against that Agency while George W. Bush was the U.S. President and invaded Iraq on the basis of faked evidence. Binney has now laid out, in this speech, the evidence that he wants to present in court against Barack Obama’s CIA, that it defrauded Americans to believe in “Russiagate” (the allegation that Russia ‘hacked’ the computers of Hillary Clinton and Democratic Party officials and fed that information to Wikileaks and other organizations).
Binney cites evidence, which, if true, conclusively proves that Russiagate was actually created fraudulently by the CIA’s extensive evidence-tampering, which subsequently became covered-up by the Special Counsel Robert Mueller, in his investigations for the Democratic Party’s first (and failed) try at impeaching and removing from office U.S. President Donald J. Trump.
...
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL2007/ ... -chief.htm
[10-minute video]
The article above provides a text transcript of the video.
Some excerpts:
We’re looking at the forensic evidence that says the DNC emails were not hacked, they were downloaded and physically transported to Wikileaks.
Well, to us, then, that means that the fabrication of the insert of the Russian signatures means that somebody modified the file and made it look like it fits the Marble framework definition of doing that kind of activity, which thus says all of this boosts with two materials pointing back now to CIA, as the origin of it, that’s the basic evidence we have, and none of it points to Russia.
In fact, we can't even find anything that points to Russia, when in fact the Mueller indictment, or the Mueller report, and that Rosenstein indictment, named some that they called trolls for the Russian government, the IRA, the Internet Research Agency, out of St. Petersburg, and Russia, they named it in a court document, and, well, the IRA over there said we are no way near, we are not in any way associated with, the Russian government, so they sent lawyers in to challenge that in the court of law here in the U.S., and the court charged the government to prove it, and they couldn’t, they couldn’t prove anything, and so the judge basically reprimanded them and said you were never to mention the IRA as in any way affiliated with the Russian government again, so their whole case was falling apart.
That last one is dealt with in more detail in this RT.com article:
DOJ drops charges against ‘Russian trolls’ after they dared demand evidence in US court
* Mueller's inability to damn Trump the way the DNC had hoped he would.
* The worthlessness of the Steele Dossier (which was commissioned by the Hillary campaign).
* The concocted smearing of Michael Flynn
* The inability of Crowdstrike to prove Russian hacking.
Russiagate is emerging very visibly as the DNC-driven hoax that it always was.