Posted: Jan 15, 2021 5:21 pm
by SafeAsMilk
The_Piper wrote:
SafeAsMilk wrote:I guess I just don't understand what your point is, then. Could you sum it up for my dull, addled brain? :dopey:

My point was for the thread, not you. That risk of safety concerns wasn't a good reason for Republicans not voting to impeach Trump. I understand it and I wouldn't want to open up my family to those threats either, but I'm not a representative. It's an unfortunate risk of the job. I wouldn't vote to re-elect someone who legislated according to personal risk. Though I'm sure I already have in the past, but when the choices are bad and worse, what's a person to do.

You probably wouldn’t be voting for them anyway since they are republican. So whether you think risk to their lives is a good enough reason or not is probably not part of their decision making. Whereas, how their constituents will vote, or increasing the odds of being killed by them, is. I don’t think “it’s part of the job” is reasonable, we’re not talking about celebrities complaining that have to deal with overzealous fans when they go grocery shopping.