Posted: Sep 25, 2021 12:10 pm
Agi Hammerthief wrote:Spearthrower wrote:
I don't understand: you're saying that all my post sounds like I want to leave the government to solve all climate related issues while I taken no action at all to mediate my own carbon footprint?
that’s a goal post shift:
you asked about one specific post, I answered about one specific post.
Now you ask about posting history.
Now I am really confused. Where exactly is there a goalpost shift?
I am still talking about the same post, and didn't mention anything about posting history.
Can we not discuss things I write, rather than things I don't write?
What....?
Your contention about what my post said is not about me? So who IS it about?
Agi Hammerthief wrote:I was just letting you know why that post sounded like it did to me:
And I asked you to explain why it sounded like that and yet you've still not explained how or why.
Agi Hammerthief wrote:Behause I‘ve heard that tune from the „my lifestyle is more important than your kids future“ brigade.
You've heard 'what tune'?
I honestly don't think you've yet addressed anything I've written, but seem to be talking a lot about things I've not written.
Agi Hammerthief wrote:It’s supposed to be a friendly hint what type of argument or had waving you might want to avoid.
Well then, how about you stop flapping your gums mate and quote explicitly where I said anything at all about wanting the government to solve climate issues while I do nothing. That is supposed to be what I said, and supposed to be what you're criticizing about my post, but even though you've said that's what you've taken from my post, as it factually isn't in my post, then you need to actually explain how you're coming to that position. At best reading, this is a misunderstanding on your part, but given how coy you seem to be with respect to explaining yourself, I can't help to solve that misunderstanding.