Posted: Apr 01, 2010 3:01 am
mmmcheezy wrote:The human and dog marriage is obviously a strawman because we're talking about CONSENTING ADULTS,
Who is we? The majority? Was there a vote while I wasn't looking? Or maybe you dont believe a vote is needed.
(Sieg heil.)
mmmcheezy wrote:As far as binning the idea of "traditional" marriage altogether, I think you'll see [once again, if you read the rest of the thread] that most of us are pretty much in favor of that.
Most of us? Is that how you want marriage laws decided. Guess what "most of us" think about gay marriage.
mmmcheezy wrote:"The idea of marriage is only to"...... blah blah blah --->insert whatever totalitarianist fundyism you like here <---
mmmcheezy wrote:Next time you feel like posting a strawman, can you at least go for one that isn't tired, one that we haven't already heard from those nasty right wing fundies hundreds of times?
Nope - I am going to keep asking you over and over again to either support or oppose incestuous marriage. If its a strawman then you can make it go away very easily by saying..."No I dont think a father and son can give informed consent to marry each other"
Lion (IRC)