Posted: Apr 01, 2010 3:46 am
There is a perfectly good reason to limit it to two people (in same species).
Governmental database schemas.
It's probably cost hundreds of millions to allow the databases to have one party as male and one as female but to allow any arbitrary number of people and certainly to allow non-human species would be a coding nightmare.
Worse than Y2k, worse than Web2.0, worse than Client-Server, worse than the day someone mentioned there is 29 days in February and we had to shift the trilithons one virgin width to the right, worse than the day Khufu, on a bender, thought it would be fun to have something really really big.
Governmental database schemas.
It's probably cost hundreds of millions to allow the databases to have one party as male and one as female but to allow any arbitrary number of people and certainly to allow non-human species would be a coding nightmare.
Worse than Y2k, worse than Web2.0, worse than Client-Server, worse than the day someone mentioned there is 29 days in February and we had to shift the trilithons one virgin width to the right, worse than the day Khufu, on a bender, thought it would be fun to have something really really big.