rationalskepticism.org

Mick wrote:

jamest wrote:

Mick wrote:I am up for debating unpopular ethical views, such as those against gay marriage or gay sex. But the mods would have to let me voice a moral argument without getting banned.

I don't see how you could provide an 'argument' for such other than "Cuz the bible says so".

Natural law theory. But it would require to argue the proposition "homosexuality is unnatural" (natural has a special meaning here). Yet, that is precisely what I was suspended for.

Sounds like a ridiculous topic since you could basically just invent some crazy version of "natural" tailored to make homsexuality not fit the definition. When you start with already disagreeing on whether the definition of "natural" used is meaningful, you won't even get to the meat about homosexuality in the first place, you'd be debating your various ethical and philosophical starting positions.