Posted: Sep 20, 2013 4:41 pm
Mick wrote:Animavore wrote:Mick wrote:THWOTH wrote:
This has been dealt with in threads and feedback threads. Your suspension was the consequence of a fourth active warning. The foruth warning was for saying that same-sex orientation was equivalent to a congenital physical deformity, among other things. You would not have to argue that same-sex orientation is equivalent to a congenital physical deformity in order to argue the NTL objection to same-sex intimacy. Nor do we need to allow a special, FUA-invoking definition of 'nature' to discuss this matter.
I didn't say it was equivalent, I said it was like one in the sense that it is a departure from proper form. You see how you suspended me without even understanding what it was that I said? Lame.
You never showed that there was a "proper form". In fact it has been demonstrated repeatedly that the term is meaningless.
Then you shouldn't have a problem defeating me.
Even if you could show homosexuality was a departure from 'proper form' you still have a long way to go to show that we should deny people rights based on this. In fact, if what you say is true, then denying homosexuals rights is as egregious as denying Down Syndrome people rights. You make your case against gay marriage, for instance, worse, not better by following this line of argument. So I'm not sure why you would even want to employ it.