Posted: Apr 08, 2014 7:04 pm
by Shrunk
michael^3 wrote:
Shrunk wrote:
michael^3 wrote:
surreptitious57 wrote:
Because he is both morally and legally responsible for the child till it becomes an adult


I see no reason why. If the woman is has the freedom to avoid the financial burden of a future baby (by killing it), then the father should have a similar right to renounce it.


By killing it?


By aborting the lump of cells that at some point may turn into a real human being, excuse the hell out of me.


No, I mean taking the baby that has been born and which he does not want to support and killing it. Shooting it or strangling it or drowning it or something. That's what you're talking about, right? You wouldn't be introducing a completely different subject to this thread that has absolutely nothing to do with your concept of abortion, would you? Because that would be a very silly way to try and argue your case.....