Posted: Nov 24, 2015 11:34 pm
Forty Two wrote:SafeAsMilk wrote:Then you think wrong, I've certainly disagreed with things she's said. It also helps that she strays from the proverbial one-note samba, something I'm sure we'd all be glad if 42 tried.
Two points on this: my threads and participation in threads covers a wide range of topics, sexism, racism, etc. News and current events. Palestine and Israel. The 2016 Presidential Election. Muslim clock maker scandal. Paris shootings. What's the last film you watched? Funny pictures. 100 Most beautiful faces. Police power to view internet history. The Bogeyman of ISIS. Should the World Adopt Islam's view of things. Reducing legal burden of proof for certain crimes. Fight over Confederate Flags. Bernie Sanders. Syria and the Law of War/Imminent Threat, Sex Robots. The Clinton Email Scandal. Justin Trudeau. Climate Change Deniers. South Park Raping and Murdering Donald Trump. Political Correctness on College Campuses. Republican Lunacy. Ashley Madison Hack. Queen Elizabeth II. Evolution of the 5 Senses. Obama and George Bush. Islam Timeline. The frivolity of fashion. Hillary Clinton's proposal on student loans. Orthodox Jews on airplanes. Gay marriage. The list goes on.
So, the first point is -- I think you are full of shit when you accuse me of being a one-note samba. In reality, there are many notes, but you are objecting to one of the notes being played.
Someone is certainly full of shit, it's clear as day to everyone (including yourself I'm sure) I was referring to the threads you've started. But I'm sure someone is convinced by you providing a list of every thread you've ever posted in ever
Two, the second point is -- why in the world does it matter if you, me or anyone else participates in a wide array of subject matter for discussion or only one or two kinds of topics?
Why in the world does it matter to you that someone finds your one-note samba to be a one-note samba? Shouldn't you just take your own advice and ignore it and discuss the topic? Or is there really no topic to discuss, and the main goal is just to troll?
What if I just came here to discuss stamp collecting, or atheism? One note samba? But, if I came here to discuss feminism and not much else? That's a problem?
Or what if you just came to troll people? Problem? You mad, bro?
In other words, one you're wrong, and two, you're not even identifying an issue that is a problem. There is no shortage of threads for people to discuss. The creation of a thread on how to make baby oil from real babies, or something, doesn't limit anyone's ability to participate in threads they like. The focus of one particular member on a given area or subject matter has no impact on the ability of other members to focus on what they like.
Thank you for this meaningless word salad. As usual, if you don't like what people are saying in this thread, take your own advice and don't respond to it. But then we wouldn't hear much from you, would we? I know your threads generate "vigorous discussion" that doesn't leave you much time to address comments like mine
All you're doing is barking about the topics someone else chooses to discuss. Well, I'm sure there are things you're interested in which I couldn't care less about. So what? Should I start carping on about how you're starting threads I don't think are worthy of discussion? Should I start harping about how you don't post in a wide enough array of subject areas? What the hell does it even matter?
I'm not sure, you're the one who seems to be losing your mind about what I say. Is it only OK for you to say what you want to say and nobody else? Or is it a standard trolling tactic to play innocent in the most bombastic and hypocritical way possible?