rationalskepticism.org

galexander wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

galexander wrote:
The only oath that could be legally sworn in the medieval era would have been an oath of absolute loyalty to the King. But that is probably what the Freemasons are swearing anyway.

Utter nonsense. Where do you get such bulls**t?

Presumably this forum believes the Freemasons like swearing oaths for the fun of it and that it's part a long standing tradition.........

.........and that this isn't BS at all!

Is it that you struggle with basic reading comprehension, or are ludicrous straw-man arguments your go-to response when you're called out on your bullshit?
No-one even hinted, much less argued the bit I bolded.
I am pointing out that your counterfactual blind assertion that oath swearing outside of to the king, was illegal.

galexander wrote:And why do I get the strong impression there are trolls on this thread? Hardly any of the posters on this thread are impartial in any way.

Says the person who consistently fails to engage with what people actually post, instead opting to lob ever more deranged straw-man accusations around...

*Edit, why did you censor my use of the world bullshit?