Posted: Jan 14, 2012 6:18 pm
A religious friend of mine recently posted this article from Uncommon Descent on his Facebook page.
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intellig ... beginning/
Now, I'm only vaguely aware of Dr. Vilenkin's work, but based on what I do now, it seems likely that a hefty amount of information is being left out of these quotes. i was just curious to see if anyone could see the New Scientist article that it references, or maybe just has some further information that I can take back to show that Dr. Vilenkin is not, in fact, providing support for the Kalam cosmological argument here.
P.S. I wasn't really sure where to put this thread. I hope this is the right place. It seems like a physics-related question.
http://www.uncommondescent.com/intellig ... beginning/
Now, I'm only vaguely aware of Dr. Vilenkin's work, but based on what I do now, it seems likely that a hefty amount of information is being left out of these quotes. i was just curious to see if anyone could see the New Scientist article that it references, or maybe just has some further information that I can take back to show that Dr. Vilenkin is not, in fact, providing support for the Kalam cosmological argument here.
P.S. I wasn't really sure where to put this thread. I hope this is the right place. It seems like a physics-related question.