Posted: Apr 27, 2012 6:46 am
asyncritus wrote:Pulsar wrote:asyncritus wrote:But then, I suppose you're the sort that would come across a watch in the grass in somebody's garden and look at it carefully, see the wheels, battery, quartz crystal if any, printed circuits, computer chip and all the other things that make it work perfectly well, and say 'it just happened'.
So you agree then that the watch is designed, while the grass isn't.
Hardly.
The grass is infinitely more complex than the watch, and speaks even more loudly of design and creation.
Ergo: complex = design.
Of course, I can show you tens of thousands of examples of complexity arising from simple rules... in fact, complexity never arises without simple rules interacting. There's no point in showing you anything though because you'll only ignore it.
For those without the religious predilection for ignoring contradictory facts, enjoy the video of 'designed complexity':
(just turn your speakers down first!)
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf0t4qIVWF4[/youtube]