Posted: Apr 30, 2012 4:57 pm
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Again, learn to quote properly.
I am telling you something: that you have do not even understand the basics of the theory of evolution, that your suggestion of the 1st swallow is ridiculously flawed. It's the chicken and the egg story all over again.
Dismissing things out of hand does not whisk them out of reality.
You have to actually show how my arguments aren't arguments.
All you're doing is plugging your ears and going : "does not!".
It's pathetic, dishonest and you can do better.
I've shown that you have not made any 'arguments'. I've repeated my demands for you to present your case, in my previous post.
Spearthrower has made a valiant effort, and I commend him for it.
You now have another first class opportunity to cop out, evade or otherwise slither away. Which one are you going to use this time?
We wait with bated breath.