Posted: Apr 30, 2012 5:14 pm
asyncritus wrote:
It must, therefore, exhibit some kinship to your own.
What must? What 'it' are you referring to?
asyncritus wrote:I keep asking your to present your case(s) which will account for
a. The origin of the amphibians from fish, specifically how a fish managed to get out of the water and survive)
b. The bats' echolocation system
c. The swallow migration
And I keep telling you that:
A. Your personal ignorance on how these things work isn't a logical argument in any way.
B. You have failed to address any of the questions and challenges I posed to you, so I do not see why I should address yours.
C. The explanations have been given several times already, at which time you either ignored them or dismissed them out of hand, leading me to conclude it's no use to present them again as you'll probably display the same dishonest behaviour again.
asyncritus wrote:and now, to add insult to injury, the migration of the eels.
No what adds insult to injury is that you continue to ignore questions and challenges posed to you and regurgitate the same incredulity argument again and again.
asyncritus wrote:Have fun, but do try to produce some sort of facts and coherent arguments. If you have nothing to say, please say that.
Pot calling the kettle black much?
You have not presented even a single fact that refutes or debunks evolution.
Nor have you presented any coherent arguments at all, only fallacy upon fallacy upon baseless assertion.
asyncritus wrote:(If possible, please avoid the 'OHHH-MMMMM mutations and natural selection' reflex mantra.
You do not get to dictate how I address your questions.
asyncritus wrote:Unless, of course, you can present some facts and maybe fossils(?) to support your miserably undernourished case).
I have already presented you with a list of observed instances of speciation, which you still haven't addressed.
