rationalskepticism.org

asyncritus wrote:

Thomas Eshuis wrote:

asyncritus wrote:

Onyx8 wrote:There is no such creature as "Swallow #1". There never was.

You keep making this mistake. Recognise it as an error, and stop doing it.

Oryx

You seriously mean to say that swallows existed from eternity, or from creation date?

See this is a straw-man, nowhere in his comment is there anything to conclude this nonsense from.

asyncritus wrote:When did the first swallow appear? Remember, you're denying the ORIGIN of species.

Keyword being SPECIES, not individual animal.

hey eshuis, if there wasn't a swallow #1, then swallows existed from all eternity.

But you're just being pathetic or worse.

Fucking platonic swallows.

No, Asyncritus - you are either being supremely deceitful of just plain stupid. You keep up these puerile strawmen. Nowhere ever in the history of evolutionary biology does any scientist or any paper ever remotely suggest that a species starts with a single individual.

You are not only wrong, but you are exhibiting an embarrassing level of stupidity to keep repeating this. Ray Comfort level.

If you want to engage, you need to raise your game astronomically. I don't actually think it's possible anymore.

You realise that if you want to attack a theory, you do at least need to comprehend the basics of it first instead of making up whatever notion takes your fancy and then attacking that... right?