Posted: Dec 30, 2012 9:49 pm
Weaver wrote:
Why? So you can cherry-pick the response to make it seem like you are right and science is wrong?
Why K-Ar dating? Why not use something with a half-life longer than the life of the planet (and the Universe), like perhaps Rb-Sr dating?
If you are truly interested in learning this material, I have a good source for you.
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/Wiens.html#page 10
Doesn't have to be potassium. We could do rubidium. But let's go through the stages (and location) from the creation of the atom through to its decay into another element. Then, and only then, can we look at what the dating method involves.