Posted: Sep 01, 2013 11:56 pm
Interesting (but predictable) that Steve's still ignoring the comments relating to him being deliberately dishonest in his knowing misrepresentations of biology, despite (according to his claims, at least) his allegedly having way more than enough education to know better.
I really can't see how someone whose writings seem to be chronically inaccurate and dishonest expects anyone to take their book seriously, apart maybe from people who want to be misled by someone pretending scientific credibility, or parents who wish to miseducate their children.
To think that someone might be relying on such people as the target market for their deliberate shitty lies is deeply sad.
Still, I suppose at least that if someone Googles his book title, there's a decent chance they might find this thread, and see how he chronically fails to even try and defend his knowing lies with any kind of rational argument, which pretty much says all that needs to be said.
I really can't see how someone whose writings seem to be chronically inaccurate and dishonest expects anyone to take their book seriously, apart maybe from people who want to be misled by someone pretending scientific credibility, or parents who wish to miseducate their children.
To think that someone might be relying on such people as the target market for their deliberate shitty lies is deeply sad.
Still, I suppose at least that if someone Googles his book title, there's a decent chance they might find this thread, and see how he chronically fails to even try and defend his knowing lies with any kind of rational argument, which pretty much says all that needs to be said.