Posted: Sep 24, 2013 7:27 pm
tolman said:
Even if someone is confused about what biologists think, if they ask a question which depends on such confusion and they are then told by one or more people that their understanding is simply wrong and they later ask the same question again without trying to follow up on the allegation that they were factually wrong, in the absence of other evidence that they were actually mentally challenged, the only rational conclusion would seem to be that they were a willing liar.
See, tolman, lucek thought he answered my question above, but he didn't. I deem his answer to not be an answer at all, which makes me a "willing liar" here. Is that how it works?