Posted: Sep 24, 2013 7:46 pm
stevebee92653 wrote:See, tolman, lucek thought he answered my question above, but he didn't. I deem his answer to not be an answer at all, which makes me a "willing liar" here. Is that how it works?
No but claiming I said you were a liar ironically would make you one. What I said was that ignoring an answer is dishonest and it is.
For note you didn't say that you didn't find the answer given good enough. You claimed that a secondary part of my post didn't constitute an answer.
stevebee92653 wrote:"WE consider you?"No, actually I asked about the steps to the evolution of tubes like blood vessels, and bird lung air sacs. Not what animals they appeared in, but how would closed systems like these evolve in small steps. I realize my inquisitiveness make me a liar here, but that's the way it is. Ask and you are dishonest. The whole shebang would be nice too. But one question at a time is fine with me. I really wonder why the cyber-group you exist in here isn't curious.
My bold.
As pointed out before I did in fact give a step by step evolutionary process BTW.
Edit:Thinking about it you could have just misinterpreted what I wrote. I assume common English turns of phrases will be understood but in case you didn't, the word yes at the beginning of a sentence can mean kinda or in a way. I thought this was clear from context(I went on to clarify my point by the end of the sentence in question) but I realize that just because someone is a published author with a few sheepskins doesn't mean that'll always read context clues.