Posted: Feb 25, 2014 11:16 pm
by Calilasseia
questioner121 wrote:
bert wrote:Cali spent a while on it and created a picture for you, questioner121.

bert wrote:
questioner121 wrote:An alternative to common ancestry is common design. This fits the observations and data far better.


No, it doesn't.
Remember vitamin C (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7e0Ic03c ... re=related)? The designer would have put the faulty gene (with the chunk missing) in gorilla's, chimps and humans. Doesn't demonstrate much intelligence.

The ERVs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dbbh1P6DW5I) are the clincher. (Make sure you understand that video).


Did you understand the video? Any comments?

Bert


It's evidence of common design.


Bullshit. First of all, even insulin doesn't exhibit "common design", because the genes are not identical in most vertebrate lineages. Second, you haven't a clue what genuine evidence for "design" consists of.

EDIT: And as others have pointed out here, why would your asserted "designer" waste effort designing broken genes? Or, for that matter, waste effort littering genomes with dead remnants of viruses, in patterns resembling exactly the patterns that would be expected to arise via evolutionary processes?