Posted: Feb 26, 2014 10:29 am
Rumraket wrote:What's the point of this? What is the designer trying to achieve? Why is he trying to make it look like evolution happened?
I don't know why the designer is did this or what he's trying to achieve. It's you who is inferring evolution, creationists don't infer evolution and we're both looking at the same data.
Why is noise inevitable in statistical analysis? How do you know it's noise and not something more fundamental? Don't you apply the same to fossils? If something doesn't fit then it must just be an anomaly? You pick and choose to support your own conclusion and then claim to have credibility because you're using scientific data which you've hand picked and leave out the things that don't fit it. This is dishonest.