Posted: Feb 26, 2014 10:06 pm
Shrunk wrote:questioner121 wrote:Shrunk wrote:Why nothing about electroreception? Why don't other land mammals have it?
Because they do:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1189155/
Excellent, now maybe you can let Sendrak know why they have it?
You thought the fact that no other land mammals had electroreception was evidence against evolution. Now that you are aware that is not a fact, but a falsehood, you are claiming that as evidence against evolution.
Just thought I'd point that out, in case you thought no one noticed.
To be honest I was expecting a lot more animals to have it on the basis that a trait like that should have been retained as it seem very useful. The fact that other animals in different parts of the phylogenetic tree is in fact evidence if common design rather than common ancestry.