Posted: Jan 26, 2015 2:29 pm
Oh we have seen much, much worse around here. Anyone remember Jireh/Coroama? That guy didn't even read what he posted, he simply searched for key words and then copy-pasted something he thought was befitting the subject matter off of some creationist apologetics site.
At one point I mentioned RNA in a response to him, and he started mindlessly linking creationist websites full of quotemines and propaganda against the RNA-world hypothesis. But that was not at all what I was talking about, my post merely contained the word RNA. At another point I linked a paper from a group of researchers at the Evolutionary Bioinformatics laboratory at the university of illinois, at which point Jireh/Coroama pasted a "response" to another paper on the Discovery Institute website. Why did he link that? Because the paper I linked had the same authors as the paper the DI post was responding to. Totally different paper and subject.
At one point he functionally admitted that when a description of the cell or some biochemical reaction included the word "complex", or that the information content in DNA could be measured in bits, he thought that in itself was evidence of intelligent design.
At one point I mentioned RNA in a response to him, and he started mindlessly linking creationist websites full of quotemines and propaganda against the RNA-world hypothesis. But that was not at all what I was talking about, my post merely contained the word RNA. At another point I linked a paper from a group of researchers at the Evolutionary Bioinformatics laboratory at the university of illinois, at which point Jireh/Coroama pasted a "response" to another paper on the Discovery Institute website. Why did he link that? Because the paper I linked had the same authors as the paper the DI post was responding to. Totally different paper and subject.
At one point he functionally admitted that when a description of the cell or some biochemical reaction included the word "complex", or that the information content in DNA could be measured in bits, he thought that in itself was evidence of intelligent design.