Posted: Feb 13, 2015 10:11 am
Jayjay4547 wrote:OK hackenslash, you call me a liar
No I didn't.
quote me on something which was a lie.
No problem:
OK hackenslash, you call me a liar
Too easy. In any event does the 'atheist ideology' bollocks ring any bells? You have repeated this despite repeatedly having been beaten about the head with why it's a lie.
You went a bit beyond even Cali, when you called Michael Behe a cunt. I’ll call you on that as well.
Feel free. He is a cunt.
Show me where in the transcript of the Dover trial, the judge said that Michael Behe had lied.
Of what fucking relevance is what the judge said? Does the judge not saying he lied mean he didn't lie?
He did say that several of the defendants had lied under oath- those were the school board members who had so incautiously tried to insist that teachers should say something in favour of Intelligent Design. The judge did cite where Behe had been stymied under cross-examination; that’s not the same as lying.
What the judge said is of exactly no fucking relevance. Behe lied about the existence of the peer-reviewed material regarding immunology and then, when beaten about the head with 58 peer-reviewed papers from the literature, insisted that they weren't good enough. He's a lying cunt.
It’s almost incredible that you claim as a fact that Behe is “a young earth cretinist”, when you are responding to a post where I pasted a direct quote in Wikipedia from Behe establishing that he isn’t. If there were some evidence that he actually denies the geological time scale, wouldn’t someone have edited that into the Wiki entry? How do you figure that someone could even manage to lie about that- to claim not to deny something, but to actually deny it?
Which bit of 'he's a lying cunt' is giving you problems here? You can tell when he's lying, because his lips are moving.
He also says intelligent design isn't creationism. He's lying about that as well.