Posted: Feb 16, 2015 9:11 am
by Thomas Eshuis

In this video Behe repeatedly dishonestly conflates appareance of design with actual design.
He also lies that all biologists see design in life.
He also plays semantic games by claiming that there are molecular machines in the same way that we humans use machines.
He pretends we haven't got evidence of macro-evolution, that it's just 'extrapolated', when there's plenty of evidence.
He plays the Darwinism canard.
He lies when insinuating evolutionary theory is weak, because biologists won't discuss ID. When he knows ID is neither a scientific theory nor has it got any supporting evidence.

Behe also, like Dembski, claims ID is a scientific theory, which is a lie for reasons presented in my post about Dembski.