Posted: Feb 26, 2016 12:31 pm
by Cito di Pense
Hobbes Choice wrote:
ScholasticSpastic wrote:I find that amateur psychoanalysis is the blind behind which many people like to withdraw when they're too lazy to do the necessary legwork to support their position.

I agree. But you need to read more, because its boring having to explain every thing. It's easy asking for citations, and ignore the ones I've given already. So as I said - run along and do the reading.

Well, let's be clear about one thing, and it is that you don't have any cohesive objection to assessing the ages of rocks and so on by considering processes of radioactive decay. If that's the case, what are you fucking around with in this thread?

If you do have an issue with our understanding of radioactive decay series, run along and do some reading about radioactive decay processes and the cosmic abundances of the elements, and how our assessment of the heat flow budget of the planet would have to be reassessed if we had to toss out what we know about radioactive decay series.