Posted: Jun 30, 2016 1:11 pm
Shrunk wrote:kyrani99 wrote:Shrunk wrote:I did not call fallible "bad".
You criticized her:What you want to do is to slam me.... This is what you really have a problem with because the premonition is evidence of the paranormal and you don't want to accept it for whatever reason
Which is what you denied doing. If your response was "You're right, I forgot about that. Sorry," then maybe it's an honest mistake. Your continued transparent denial, however, moves this into an outright lie. This is not complicated.
Criticism you're complaining off. So what are you doing?
I'm criticizing you. Difference is, I never denied doing so. You did. Can you follow that?
when did I deny criticizing? There is a big difference between criticizing and calling someone bad.
You are the one making it up as you go along.
back on this page
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/paran ... -1860.html
post 1879 you cut my sentence in half and just made it up.
I had said: As a psychiatrist he knows that people recall emotionally charged events with stuff overlapping but he chose to call it deceit.
You chopped it to "As a psychiatrist he knows" and turned it into "Ah. So you admit psychiatrists know stuff." That is a general suggestion, hence meaningless! What's stuff? Could be anything.
Then you used the rest of my sentence: "that people recall emotionally charged events with stuff overlapping but he chose to call it deceit."
And you claimed: "Ah. So admit your reporting of the story was inaccurate because of your emotional state. We should just ignore it, then. Thank you. That takes care of that."
It is consistent I guess with what psychiatrists do. No need for evidence, just make it up. Now you want to pin your insincerity on me.
An experience may undergo changes each time it is remembered. This is not something unique to me. It is seen in all people's recollections. In fact eyewitness accounts that are very recent, even in terms of days, can have differences to the original experience. My experience is between 40 and 50 years ago! There are differences. When I had more time to think about it I remembered more and I realized I wrote what had first come to mind. You are calling my experience "the story" and then you are labeling it with "inaccurate" and justifying yourself to say "we should just ignore it". Can YOU follow that?