Posted: Nov 21, 2016 1:50 pm
Cito di Pense wrote:This should not be surprising. It's tempting to continue to give prevaricators a chance, but it never bears fruit. Documenting their failures is far more productive than arguing with them or lamenting their deficiencies.
Quite. I had a discussion on another forum with VJ Torley, one of the chief protagonists in the mathgrrl affair. He claimed to have answered mathgrrl's questions, but the link he provided contained nothing even resembling an answer. When I pointed out this oversight, he was never heard from again:
http://sandwalk.blogspot.ca/2015/11/ans ... 4711789441
It also happens that one of the IDiots has inadvertently admitted that CSI can, indeed, be produced by natural, non-intelligent processes, although neither he nor any of his colleagues seem to have yet realized he has done so.
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post1809165.html