Posted: May 05, 2017 3:08 pm
Calilasseia wrote:Gila Guerilla wrote:Evolutionist: "Such and such an evolutionary line split off from such and such else evolutionary line, X hundreds of thousands of years ago".
Creationist: "That's wrong - were you there ??? (Sucker)."
I don't have to be. Physical processes leave behind evidence of their occurrence, much of it persistent. You are persistent evidence that your parents had sex.
That'll shake them.
I would modify your response as follows:
Creationist: "That's wrong - were you there ??? (Sucker)."
I don't have to be. Physical processes leave behind evidence of their occurrence, much of it persistent. You are persistent evidence that your parents' egg and sperm cells mated. We would need additional evidence as to whether that was accomplished through sexual intercourse, in vitro fertilization or some other means. Wouldn't you agree? If not, why not?