Posted: Aug 15, 2017 3:28 pm
Wortfish wrote: Why should Nature conform to a rationally intelligible framework?
1. Homo sapiens sapiens are pattern seeking organisms. We go around seeing patterns and creating frameworks and then, despite being the creators of such things, reach fault conclusions that what we perceive must has been created.
2. Do you assume that any other intelligent lifeform would devise the same "rationally intelligible frameworks" as we have?
3. Would our frameworks even appear "rationally intelligible" to other sentient lifeforms?
4. It is NOT rationally inteligible to assume that nature "conforms" to our frameworks.
5. What is rationally intelligble is that we have developed frameworks which conform to nature.