Posted: Oct 30, 2017 5:37 pm
by DavidMcC
DavidMcC wrote:
Shrunk wrote:
DavidMcC wrote:That was my point: maybe they aren't, and they are slipping in a bit of creationism in by stealth.


Yeah, I misspoke in my post. I should have written "Even if they aren't atheists, that does not mean they are creationists."

But, sure, it's also possible that they are creationists. Which would kind of put the kibosh on your other conspiracy theory that PLOS ONE just cooked this all up to boost readership. ...

Please withdraw your absurd claim that I am some kind of conspiracy theorist, just because I realise that even science journals occasionally indulge in sensationalism, perhaps to boost flagging sales.