Posted: Oct 31, 2017 2:15 pm
by Shrunk
DavidMcC wrote:I still think that it is disgusting for a science journal to publish stuff about a Creator, however, and still think the motive was likely to be controversial, so boosting sales. I also find it hard to accept that the authors would not have realised what they were saying.

Thanks for your opinions. I'll file them away alongside Wortfish's opinion that this is all motivated by scientists' "insecurity" over whether evolution is a more valid hypothesis than creationism.