Posted: Jan 11, 2018 6:27 pm
by DavidMcC
Sendraks wrote:
DavidMcC wrote:
Sendraks wrote:
DavidMcC wrote:
Well, not "design" in the usual, conscious sense, of course, but in the sense of "trial and error", as in military wing "design" (the crucial bit, that you mysteriously left out in your reply).


*sigh*
I didn't "mysteriously" leave anything out of my reply, given there was nothing in what I quoted about "military wing design" and therefore no reason why I would comment about such a thing. Once again you unhelpfully go down the path of projecting all sorts of agendas onto your interlocutors.

A. I am not "projecting all sorts of agendas".
B. The question is, why did you not mention military wing design. I looks like convenience to me, because it enables you to pretend that all connotations of the word, "design" imply consciousness. Ask Cali, he'll put you right.

EDIT: BTW, the military wing design methodology is sometimes known as "evolutionary design", for obvious reasons.


Are you talking to me or to Cito? Only on the previous page, WHERE YOU ALREADY RESPONDED TO THIS COMMENT, you claimed it was directed at Cito not me.

Does it really matter? The offending post was edited to hide one of the posters' identity, ad life's too short to dive ito that level of detail when it's only a derail anyway.