Posted: Jan 09, 2019 10:40 pm
by archibald
Cito di Pense wrote:We have a 1956 reference to the term from Quine, so that must mean the term is valuable.


I'm sure you have a better one, and I'm literally dying to hear all about it.

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

(There's nothing personal or especially relevant about the number of smilies; I'm just doing my bit for the world record attempt, though I did make my contribution more tidy and ordered and rational than yours, but then I do that during our exchanges in the general sense anyway).