Posted: Apr 15, 2019 12:30 am
Wortfish wrote:
Well, there is a heck of a lot of neutral evolution proposed in the paper.
They're not mutually exclusive.
Wortfish wrote:However, the authors dishonesly try to pass it off as selection.
Rather rude of you to call it dishonest, isn't it? Especially when you're clearly lacking sufficient knowledge to understand that neutral evolution and selection can both be operating simultaneously.
Have you been going through their dustbins? What's your angle on calling the authors dishonest? I want to know.