Posted: May 16, 2019 7:36 am
by Cito di Pense
Jayjay4547 wrote:And so long as you link science with rabid atheism, that is bad publicity for science.


Maybe. But the extent of your reliance on modern (scientific) medicine when you are ill is good publicity for science. Your reliance on scientific technology to spam the internet with texts of your (xian) ideology is good publicity for science and bad publicity for anti-science.

Of course, of all those present here, you're the one who's decided to link science with 'rabid atheism". The rabies is all in your mind, and given the disposition, one could diagnose a mental illness after a certain point. This is not a condemnation, but merely a means of deciding how seriously to take a random anonymous opinion of 'rabid atheism'.

Jayjay4547 wrote:One could just as well argue that science got us into this mess by enabling unsustainable population growth, energy consumption, waste production and enslavement of the environment.


We can only treat it as a 'mess' if we think there's something special about humans, or (indeed) about life. Vitalism FTW. Will it go 'round in circles? Will it fly high like a bird up in the sky?