Posted: Jun 04, 2019 2:22 pm
Your posts on this issue are consistent with your having assumed that skull was female...
Whereas, the reality actually is:
You assumed the replica composite skull was male - and by assumed, I mean you didn't know your arse from your elbow.
I didn't 'assume' anything. I know what fossils were used in its compositing.
Your assumption is based on wanting something to be true to win an argument with people you detest on the internet.
My reply is simply an accurate description of the facts, and while they may be inconvenient for you, that's really only your problem.