Posted: Jun 24, 2019 9:39 am
by Cito di Pense
Jayjay4547 wrote:You aren’t compelled to respond but you do, while using every trick of misrepresentation and at much greater length than my own arguments. Again, the “forces” I was referring to are those of atheist ideology.


Your arguments, JJ, are brief because there's so little substance in them. Your arguments have necessarily become much briefer since it was made abundantly clear how incompetent you are in discussing the facts of human evolution.

The question we might also ask of JJ is: What scientific facts is he not mis-representing? There are some, but it's hard to tease them out of all the blather about atheist ideology.

You wrote "squeezing", JJ. To say that you are not misrepresenting evolutionary processes by personifying them is a bit of a stretch, rather than a squeeze.

Jayjay4547 wrote:I just used them to demonstrate a deterioration in the position of skeptics over the last 90 years.


It's not a deterioration, JJ. That's another misrepresentation you've stuck inyo your facile opinions. What's augmented are the numbers of facts you can't wibble your way around. So far, the score is Sicence, a zillion and JJ, nought. It's the proliferation of scientific knowledge, the relevant details of which you discard in favor of quoting stuff written nearly a century ago for some of the bullshit you've piled the deepest.

The apparent complexity of life gives creationists conniptions, but pared down to a simple level suitable for discussing it with you, living organisms are just bags containing lots of coupled chemical reactions. Go marvel at that, JJ! If I don't have reverence for that, yet, you're just going to have to tell a better story.