Posted: Jun 25, 2019 11:32 am
by Cito di Pense
Jayjay4547 wrote:You can’t deny the observable by denying a conjecture about what is associated with it. Let’s stick with what we can agree about, based on what can be observed.


What did I just finish telling you about what I am quite capable of denying. You have an idiosyncratic definition of creativity and of intent, and you can't sell it. So, you make up excuses about "atheist ideology". You can fuck right off with that, because it's only about the hundredth time you've repeated a bunch of religious nuttery that we call 'creationism'.

Jayjay4547 wrote:Of course, I do act on the basis that there is intent in the universe; there is a God but that is based on my intuition.


Well, JJ, fuck your intuition. Sideways, with a geological hammer that your interlocutors have offered you to stop the flow of mental sewage you are dumping, here.

Jayjay4547 wrote: Is creativity a force? Creativity can be observed, by comparing the world today with the world 3 billion years ago. It has been a property in the first place, of large biomes.


You're not saying jack shit any more about whether creativity is a force, JJ. Now it's just your fucking moronic intuition.