Posted: Jun 25, 2019 11:32 am
Jayjay4547 wrote:What I want to get over is that the ideology built up to support the opposite conjecture has messed up the human origin narrative in the name of evolution.
Something's messed it up for you, JJ. You have my condolences, but please fuck off with all the whining.
What's "creativity" without intent, JJ? Without intent, it's just a movie you're playing in reverse for yourself, looking through the wrong end of the telescope to see something planned when nothing was planned. So fine, JJ, let's let you call it creativity. What would you have anyone else do with your little just-so story?.....
I wrote that, JJ, and you have answered with more of your lame, prejudiced, bigoted lying intuition.
Jayjay4547 wrote:Anyway you make a good point that squeezing (my term) is a force. On the other hand magma can be squeezed out of a magma chamber without intent.
Do you feel squeezed by the fact that you're not being allowed to re-define concepts like 'squeezing', 'intent', 'creativity', and 'observable'. Do you feel squeezed by the fact that you may as well fuck off where you came from for all the functionality you're trying to introduce? You're proselytizing, JJ. Creationist, religiously-based bollocks.
Jayjay4547 wrote:I suppose you intended an underline there, not a strikethough.
Such a sudden attention to detail. If only your feeble efforts at paleontology were capable of noticing your own errors as eagerly as you lap up typos in other people's work.