Posted: Jun 26, 2019 3:02 am
Soearthrower's supposed rebuttal isn’t even on the issue I raised, where he declined to post proof of what he claimed here:
Spearthrower never did post the images to prove his allegaiton, but I put together images he had posted, here they are:
As you can see, the only pic of a skull with long sharp canine (c), isn’t even a fossil, let alone a hominin.
Spearthrower wrote:Jayjay4547 wrote:Jayjay4547 wrote:Contrary evidence? All Spearthrower (or any other poster) needed to present was a pic of an Australopithecus male skull with long pointy canines. He didn’t present that. Instead he actually agreed that a Smithsonian note that Australopithecus like all later humans, had small canines.
And another lie! Fantastic!
As anyone can see, I haven't just posted a single picture of an australopithecine with sharp, pointy canines, I have posted several, and I did so within hours of JJ's initial claims that they did not possess them.
Spearthrower never did post the images to prove his allegaiton, but I put together images he had posted, here they are:
- Spearthrower_Teeth_Comparisons.png (795.84 KiB) Viewed 266 times
As you can see, the only pic of a skull with long sharp canine (c), isn’t even a fossil, let alone a hominin.