Posted: Aug 09, 2019 6:28 pm
by theropod
What’s the need? My one question to Kent would be as follows:

What empirical evidence do you have to support your base assertion that there is a god at all, and by what means may I replicate your testing?

He, as he always does, would go off on a Gish Gallop and never address the root problem with all supernatural claims. There’s simply no evidence, of an empirical nature, which supports these assertions. Until such time as the adherents of belief come up with some of that evidence the rest of the qualities such people as Kent assign to their deity is nothing but dressing for the cake. Trouble is Kent wants his dressed up cake, and for us to eat it, when there is nothing but an empty plate.