Posted: Sep 11, 2019 2:08 pm
Thomas Eshuis wrote:
Once again you fail to provide a sound and coherent definition of atheist ideology, meaning that once again the rest of your post is irrelevant wibble.
From his previous comments I think JayJay's explanation is coherent, it just isn't sound.
JayJay thinks that following Darwin, the analysis of evidence about the evolution of life was influenced by atheism because it caused scientists to reach conclusions about the evidence they wouldn't have reached had they been thinking with a "creator-centric" hat on.
However, as I've tackled in posts months ago, this is purely what JayJay "thinks." He can't actually provide any evidence that this did happen, that atheism in any way influenced the rigour of the scientific process and therefore he can't demonstrate that the "atheist ideology" has he imagines it, actually exists.
We also know, as it has been repeatedly demonstrated in JayJay's posts, is the only reason JayJay thinks scientists could have reached different conclusions because "creationism" is down to his appalling like of understanding about evolution and science in general.
Its just another fine example of theistic circular reasoning.
JayJay thinks this - therefore it is so - if it wasn't so JayJay wouldn't think it.