Posted: Sep 22, 2019 5:43 am
by Spearthrower
Jayjay4547 wrote:
Ironically, the distinctive feature across the Australopithecus genus, was that neither male nor females had fang like canines.

It is indeed ironic that you still think this given the number of references to papers by trained palaeoanthropologists I've cited expressly contradicting this dogmatic belief you insist on in the absence of evidence or education.

The irony is that you continue to believe this because you are motivated by a religious belief which in no way requires you to hold this position.

The reason you continue to hold this position is a combination of pure arrogance and confidence in your Creationist beliefs, and a hostile prejudice against the members of this forum.